Royal Panda Self Exclusion

Royal Panda – Self exclusion Ruling. Found for the Casino - Currently Royal Panda are still operating as a separate company to Leo Vegas and are not registered with GamStop. Read our Royal Panda Casino Review. Player's Complaint. Hi around 6 weeks ago I signed up to the Gamstop self exclusion program after admitting I was an addict. Claim 100% first deposit bonus up to £100 at Royal Panda!18+, first deposit only, T&Cs apply. Casino bonus: min. Bonus/free spins winnings wagering Self Exclusion To One Indian Casinos In Los Angeles requirement: x35. Royal Panda – self-exclusion Ruling. Found for the Casino - Where the player takes action specifically intended to get round a self-exclusion the operator cannot be held responsible for the consequences. Read our Royal Panada Casino Review. Player's Complaint. I personally self excluded myself from royal panda about 2 months ago. Self-exclusion refers to the practice of suspending your gambling account for a set period of time. It is a tool that is meant to help people from managing their gambling as we know addiction can be a problem in this business. How does self-exclusion work in Royal Panda.

Royal Panda – Self exclusion Ruling. Resolved - A switch in applicable license created a Responsible Gambling loophole which the player fell through. Royal Panda have returned funds. Read our Royal Panda Casino Review. Player's Complaint. I selfexcluded my self on 13/07/14 I.

Ruling

Found for the Casino - Currently Royal Panda are still operating as a separate company to Leo Vegas and are not registered with GamStop.

Read our Royal Panda Casino Review.

Player's Complaint

Hi around 6 weeks ago I signed up to the Gamstop self exclusion program after admitting I was an addict. However after only a few days I found myself a casino that would accept me even though almost all wouldn't due to Gamstop. I registered on royal panda and amounted losses of 2 months salary at around £5000 which I already owed People due to my addiction. Whilst looking through Gamstop list of excluded casinos I see that royal panda isn't there however the company that own it Leo Vegas is. I find this very hypocritical and on further investigation I found someone on this site who had the same problem with pink Casino. Pink are owned also by Leo Vegas and after some investigation the player was refunded their deposits whilst they should have been self excluded. I have contacted royal panda to tell them I don't think it's right however they keep saying they aren't involved with Gamstop but my point is their owner Leo vegas is and if the other person was refunded for playing on one of its other companies could I be for playing on royal panda?

Best regards

[EDIT]

1 Response

Hi markbck59 - welcome to ThePOGG.com!

Unfortunately there's not going to be anything we can do to help you in this instance.

While you are correct that Leo Vegas, Pink Casino and Royal Panda are all owned by the same parent company, the difference between your case and the other case you reference is that Leo Vegas and Pink Casino are both owned directly by LeoVegas Gaming PLC, a company that is listed as participating in Gamstop. Currently Royal Panda has not been brought into the LeoVegas Gaming PLC company structure and still runs as an independent company, Royal Panda Limited. Royal Panda Limited do not currently participate in the Gamstop program so a Gamstop self-exclusion would apply at both LeoVegas and Pink but would not apply at Royal Panda.

Sorry we could not be of further help.

ThePOGG